Current:Home > StocksA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -Zenith Profit Hub
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-14 13:49:09
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Tua Tagovailoa's return to field a huge success, despite interception on first play
- Why USWNT's absence from World Cup final is actually great for women's soccer
- Nightengale's Notebook: Get your tissues ready for these two inspirational baseball movies
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Why Teen Mom's Leah Messer Said She Needed to Breakup With Ex-Fiancé Jaylan Mobley
- Navy shipbuilders’ union approves 3-year labor pact at Bath Iron Works
- Grand jury decides against charges in police shooting of NJ backhoe driver who damaged homes, cars
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Sweden beats Australia 2-0 to win another bronze medal at the Women’s World Cup
Ranking
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Navy shipbuilders’ union approves 3-year labor pact at Bath Iron Works
- Trump says he will skip GOP presidential primary debates
- Ecuadorians are choosing a new president amid increasing violence that may scare away voters
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- California’s big bloom aids seed collectors as climate change and wildfires threaten desert species
- Save $235 on This Dyson Cordless Vacuum and Give Your Home a Deep Cleaning With Ease
- The University of New Orleans picks 5 semifinalists in their search for a president
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Police: Man blocking traffic fatally shot after pointing gun at Detroit officer
Red Sox infielder Luis Urías makes history with back-to-back grand slams
Patriots' Isaiah Bolden released from hospital; team cancels joint practice with Titans
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Rare flesh-eating bacteria kills 5 in Florida, 3 in New York, Connecticut
Patriots' Isaiah Bolden released from hospital; team cancels joint practice with Titans
Why we love Bright Side Bookshop in Flagstaff, Ariz. (and why they love 'Divine Rivals')