Current:Home > InvestA federal judge canceled major oil and gas leases over climate change -Zenith Profit Hub
A federal judge canceled major oil and gas leases over climate change
View
Date:2025-04-14 11:14:49
Late last year, just days after pledging to cut fossil fuels at international climate talks in Glasgow, Scotland, the Biden administration held the largest oil and gas lease sale in U.S. history.
On Thursday, a federal judge invalidated that sale in the Gulf of Mexico, saying the administration didn't adequately consider the costs to the world's climate.
The administration used an analysis conducted under former President Donald Trump that environmental groups alleged was critically flawed.
The decision represents a major win for a coalition of environmental groups that challenged the controversial sale, calling it a "huge climate bomb."
Eighty million acres — an area twice the size of Florida — were put up for auction in November.
Climate groups urged the Biden administration to stop the sale, but the Interior Department said it was compelled to move forward after a different federal judge struck down the administration's temporary moratorium on new oil and gas lease sales. Oil and gas companies only ended up bidding on 1.7 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico.
Those leases will be vacated by the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia's decision, and the Interior Department will have to conduct a new environmental analysis if it decides to hold another sale.
"We are pleased that the court invalidated Interior's illegal lease sale," said Earthjustice's senior attorney, Brettny Hardy. "We simply cannot continue to make investments in the fossil fuel industry to the peril of our communities and increasingly warming planet."
The development and consumption of fossil fuels is the largest driver of climate change. The world has already warmed by more than 1 degree Celsius since preindustrial times, worsening wildfires, hurricanes and heat waves, and disrupting the natural world.
Roughly a quarter of the country's total greenhouse gas emissions come from fossil fuels extracted from public lands.
The Biden administration has promised to review the country's oil and gas leasing program to better account for its contribution to climate change.
Shortly after taking office, it temporarily blocked all new oil and gas leasing on public lands while it conducted its review, but the moratorium was struck down after being challenged by more than a dozen Republican-led states.
Scheduled lease sales resumed after that decision, including the massive sale in the Gulf, which elicited nearly $200 million in bids.
The climate impact analysis used by the Biden administration was actually conducted under Trump. It argued that not leasing the acreage would result in more greenhouse gas emissions because it would increase fossil fuel production abroad.
U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras wrote that the Interior Department acted "arbitrarily and capriciously in excluding foreign consumption from their greenhouse gas emissions," adding that the "error was indeed a serious failing."
"The U.S. offshore region is vital to American energy security and continued leases are essential in keeping energy flowing from this strategic national asset," said Erik Milito, president of the National Ocean Industries Association, in a statement.
The Biden administration could choose to do a new analysis and put the section of the Gulf of Mexico up in another lease sale. Environmental groups would be waiting.
"The fight is not over," said Hallie Templeton, legal director at Friends of the Earth. "We will continue to hold the Biden administration accountable for making unlawful decisions that contradict its pledge to take swift, urgent action on 'code red' climate and environmental justice priorities."
veryGood! (744)
Related
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Smoke From Western Wildfires Darkens the Skies of the East Coast and Europe
- In the San Joaquin Valley, Nothing is More Valuable than Water (Part 1)
- Can Massachusetts Democrats Overcome the Power of Business Lobbyists and Pass Climate Legislation?
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Court Sides With Trump on Keystone XL Permit, but Don’t Expect Fast Progress
- Wage theft often goes unpunished despite state systems meant to combat it
- Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Harvard, universities across U.S. react to Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- 10 Best Portable Grill Deals Just in Time for Summer: Coleman, Cuisinart, and Ninja Starting at $20
- A Most ‘Sustainable’ Vineyard in a ‘Completely Unsustainable’ Year
- Supreme Court blocks student loan forgiveness plan, dealing blow to Biden
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Utility Giant FirstEnergy Calls for Emergency Subsidy, Says It Can’t Compete
- Environmental Justice Knocks Loudly at the White House
- Peter Thomas Roth Flash Deal: Get $260 Worth of Retinol for $89 and Reduce Wrinkles Overnight
Recommendation
Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
Geothermal: Tax Breaks and the Google Startup Bringing Earth’s Heat into Homes
Harvard, universities across U.S. react to Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling
The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Q&A: One Baptist Minister’s Long, Careful Road to Climate Activism
A Most ‘Sustainable’ Vineyard in a ‘Completely Unsustainable’ Year
What is affirmative action? History behind race-based college admissions practices the Supreme Court overruled