Current:Home > ScamsAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -Zenith Profit Hub
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-17 06:47:31
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- In cruel twist of fate, Martin Truex Jr. eliminated from NASCAR playoffs after speeding
- New Federal Housing Grants Are a Win for Climate Change and Environmental Justice
- Horoscopes Today, September 21, 2024
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- NFL Week 3 injury report: Live updates for active, inactive players for Sunday's games
- Sudden death on the field: Heat is killing too many student athletes, experts say
- A Thousand Lives Lost, and Millions Disrupted, by Flooding in Western Africa
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Microsoft announces plan to reopen Three Mile Island nuclear power plant to support AI
Ranking
- 'Most Whopper
- Jalen Carter beefs with Saints fans, is restrained by Nick Sirianni after Eagles win
- Lady Gaga Details Her Harley Quinn Transformation for Joker: Folie à Deux
- White Sox lose 120th game to tie post-1900 record by the 1962 expansion New York Mets
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- What game is Tom Brady broadcasting in Week 3? Where to listen to Fox NFL analyst
- The 'Veep' cast will reunite for Democratic fundraiser with Stephen Colbert
- Kyle Larson dominates at Bristol, four Cup drivers eliminated from NASCAR playoffs
Recommendation
Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
Hilarie Burton Reveals the Secret to Her Long-Lasting Relationship With Jeffrey Dean Morgan
Hilarie Burton Reveals the Secret to Her Long-Lasting Relationship With Jeffrey Dean Morgan
College applications are stressful. Here's how more companies are helping.
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Washington Nationals' CJ Abrams sent to minors after casino all-nighter
These Secrets About The West Wing Are What's Next
Week 3 fantasy football rankings: PPR, half-PPR and standard leagues